Important Update: We have ended our relationship with Venice. For a powerful all-in-one AI image and video creation tool, we recommend Dzine or one of the other several Venice AI Alternatives.
(Dzine Affiliate link)
Note: This post was updated in October 2026 to reflect verified features and changes that were introduced since the initial publication date.
I first reviewed Venice AI back in 2024, and at the time, I was a big fan, and I was one of the first ones to do it.
A lot has changed since then.
I’ve used Venice extensively, promoted it to my audience, watched the platform evolve, and eventually had my own personal experience dealing with the company behind it. My opinion today is less positive.
So this updated Venice AI review is going to be different.
I’ll cover what Venice still does well, what has gotten worse, whether Venice AI is safe and trustworthy, what you’re actually getting for your money in 2026, and why I no longer recommend it the way I once did.
And as a side note, I’d highly recommend considering a solid Venice AI alternative before deciding to purchase Venice. There are a lot of apps that do similar things, and some of them are even free.
Venice AI Reviews from Around The Web
I’m not the only one having a rough time with Venice lately. Reviews in other places raise familiar complaints about bugs, wasted credits, and support. Here’s what I found in October 2026.
Trustpilot: This is where it gets ugly. Venice had 1.8/5 from 61 reviews, with 74% giving it one star. Julian Krick reports paying for Pro without receiving it, then getting no response from support. Paying customers should not have to chase the product they paid for.


PissedConsumer: Venice also had 1.7/5 from just two rated reviews. One reviewer says support took about a week to respond. Another reports Pro access problems despite paying, though that complaint is marked resolved. Small sample, ugly feedback. Obviously, this is a tiny sample size, but it’s still something to keep in mind.


Apple’s App Store: The U.S. listing had a much better 4.2/5 from 1.3K ratings. Still, DJsekani’s two-star review describes failed video generations, lost credits, and lost chat progress. Those bugs get expensive fast.


Google Play: Venice had 4.1/5 from 4.26K reviews overall. Dave Hagerman’s one-star review reports repeated errors, no credit refunds after failed attempts, and higher credit charges than quoted. Hardly what you want from a paid AI tool.


These are selected negative reviews, not everyone’s experience. But they’re worth reading before handing Venice your hard-earned money.
Now, let’s look at the privacy claims.
Is Venice AI Really a “Privacy” Powerhouse?
When I originally wrote this Venice AI review in 2024, privacy was one of the biggest reasons I recommended Venice to my audience.
My opinion has changed.
After my personal experience dealing with Venice’s management team, which I’ll explain later in this review, I no longer trust Venice as a company. That doesn’t automatically mean its technology isn’t private. Those are two different things. I don’t work for Venice, I haven’t inspected its servers, and I haven’t physically seen what happens to your prompts behind the curtain.
So I’m not going to tell you that Venice secretly stores your conversations or spies on you. I have no evidence of that. Maybe it’s true, and maybe it’s not.
What I can tell you is that I personally no longer trust the people running the company. When a product is asking you to trust it with potentially sensitive information, that’s a big deal.
There have also been some privacy improvements since I originally wrote this review.
Venice now divides its models into different privacy categories. Its regular Private mode relies on zero-data-retention policies and contractual commitments, per Venice. Venice itself describes this mode as “trust-based.” Pro subscribers can also use certain models through TEE, or Trusted Execution Environment, and E2EE, or end-to-end encryption.
E2EE is interesting because your prompt is encrypted on your device and is only decrypted inside a verified hardware environment. Venice says users can independently verify the attestation associated with the request.
The problem is that Venice’s explanation of how all of this works is filled with enough technical jargon to make a normal person’s brain start leaking out of its ears. Maybe that’s partially on me. I’m not a cryptographer. But if privacy is your biggest selling point, explaining it to normal people should probably be a priority.
Also, and this is a big point as of July 2026, I have not been able to find a single published independent third-party privacy audit of Venice’s entire privacy architecture. This remains one of the most-requested features by Venice’s audience, and they still haven’t done it, which I would consider suspicious.
So where does that leave me?
Venice appears to have built some legitimate privacy features, particularly E2EE. But when using its regular trust-based privacy modes, you are still placing some degree of trust in Venice, its leadership team, and its infrastructure partners.
As for the many people who don’t care about privacy because they “have nothing to hide,” I had Venice write a little something for you so you can understand why you’re 100% wrong. Be sure to send this to anyone you know who thinks they have nothing to hide.

Is Venice AI Still a Good Unfiltered ChatGPT Alternative?
I loved to jailbreak ChatGPT. It was fun. It doesn’t work so well anymore, but the most fun part about it was the freedom of expression that an unfiltered experience brings. With the jailbreak, ChatGPT became an AI chatbot with no filters, letting you say what you want (within reason).
And although jailbreaking worked to give you that unfiltered AI chatting experience, it was far from perfect. OpenAI would slam you with red text after you asked it anything it didn’t like. Sometimes the jailbreak just wouldn’t work at all.
And other times, you probably wondered whether any of those conversations would ever get stored indefinitely for “violating” OpenAI’s terms and conditions. Well, you’re probably right, although I have no proof.
Anyway, this section of my original review from 2024 was basically a Venice love letter.
Things have changed quite a bit.
Venice is still considerably less censored than ChatGPT for certain types of content. If you want an unfiltered AI chatbot with fewer restrictions, controversial conversations, adult content, politically incorrect humor, or other topics mainstream AI companies sometimes restrict, Venice remains fairly useful.
That is also why Venice still gets attention from people looking for an NSFW ChatGPT alternative or an unfiltered ChatGPT alternative.
Here’s a quick example. And for the record, I am white. And this is a joke.
ChatGPT

Venice AI

Venice is still uncensored, but it isn’t as uncensored as it once was.
I have been using Venice since 2024, and I’ve watched those boundaries gradually change. It still gives you more freedom than ChatGPT in many situations, but the original feeling has faded.
Ironically, “uncensored” remains one of the main reasons people use Venice, regardless of how much Venice itself wants that word attached to its brand.
If you are specifically looking for a no-filter AI experience, Venice still gets closer than many mainstream AI platforms. Just understand that “unfiltered” is relative now compared to the past.
Venice AI Is Getting Slow and Sluggish
There’s another issue.
Venice has been painfully slow for me lately.
I’ve had responses take an absurd amount of time, requests time out, and some of the better open-source models become frustrating to use.


This is particularly disappointing because Venice used to be updated constantly.
I used to see that little “reload Venice to get the latest version” notification on the bottom-right side of my screen multiple times per day (yes, I used it that much). Now I might see it every few days.
That is obviously anecdotal. I don’t have access to Venice’s internal development schedule. But as someone who has used the platform heavily for roughly two years, the pace feels different.
The performance does too.
From the outside, it looks to me like a platform that hasn’t scaled properly with its increased demand.
Venice AI vs. ChatGPT in 2026
This comparison has changed dramatically since I originally wrote this Venice AI review.
Venice Pro currently costs $18 per month. ChatGPT Plus costs $20 per month.
So we are basically talking about the same price.
That creates a much harder argument for Venice.
For $20 per month, ChatGPT Plus gives you access to a massive ecosystem of tools for actual work. There’s Deep Research, GPTs, file analysis, image generation, ChatGPT Voice, Projects, agents, Codex, and an increasingly ridiculous number of other things OpenAI keeps cramming into the platform.
ChatGPT has gone from “AI chatbot” to something closer to an AI operating system for getting real work done.
Venice simply does not compete with that feature-for-feature.
Venice does give you something ChatGPT doesn’t: a big selection of models from different companies.
That sounds incredible on paper, and it is in a way.
But ask yourself something.
Do you actually need 30 AI models?
I use AI all day, every day, and most of the time I just want the best model for whatever I’m doing.
At the time of this writing, OpenAI’s GPT-5.6 family is extremely powerful, and GPT-5.6 Sol Pro is currently OpenAI’s highest-capability GPT-5.6 option for difficult work. For most ChatGPT Plus users, having access to excellent models plus all of ChatGPT’s other tools is more useful than staring at a giant model selector.
Venice does let you access models from companies such as OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, xAI, Zhipu, Alibaba, and others.
Here’s the catch, though: Many premium and frontier models use Venice credits.
Venice Pro currently gives you 100 credits per month, which equals $1.00 in Venice’s credit system.
Once that $1 is gone, premium usage can cost you additional money.
So don’t look at Venice Pro’s model list and assume your $18 subscription gives you unlimited access to every model you see. It doesn’t.
That’s an important distinction, because I can easily see someone signing up for Venice Pro, seeing GPT, Claude, Grok, premium image generators, video models, and everything else on the platform and assuming the buffet is included.
Some of it is, but some of it has a cash register sitting right next to it.
And the promo code I previously offered Run The Prompts readers is gone, so I no longer have a Venice discount to give you. Nobody does. The promos from everyone are over forever, as far as I know.
Is Venice AI Still Uncensored and NSFW-Friendly?
This is still one of Venice’s best upsides.
Venice remains a lot less restrictive than ChatGPT in many areas, which is why searches for things like Venice AI NSFW, unfiltered AI, and uncensored AI continue to be closely associated with the platform.
But after using it since 2024, I don’t think “uncensored” means what it did when Venice originally launched.
There are more boundaries now. Venice has gotten more prudish over time. Some models are considerably worse than others. Venice also has its own “Venice Uncensored” model specifically designed for less restricted conversations.
So yes, you can still use Venice for NSFW content and other topics that mainstream AI platforms may reject.
Just don’t expect the same Wild West experience as 2024 when I wrote about Venice when it was brand new.
The sheriff has arrived, and he’s not always happy.
For uncensored AI video creation, I would still recommend Dzine.
Is Venice AI Safe and Private Enough for Your Sensitive Data?

My old recommendation was basically this: If you have sensitive information, then use Venice.
I wouldn’t make that blanket recommendation anymore.
Venice says conversations are stored locally, its Private models operate under zero-data-retention arrangements, and some Pro models can now use hardware-verified TEE or fully end-to-end encrypted E2EE inference.
Those are real privacy features, as long as Venice is telling the truth about absolutely everything that they advertise.
So, is Venice AI safe for sensitive information?
I can’t give you a definitive yes or no. What I can tell you is that I personally would not trust Venice with truly sensitive information or data anymore.
For sensitive material, my preference would be even simpler: Run the AI locally on your own machine.
A local model running directly on hardware you control removes the third-party AI provider from the inference process completely.
And this has become much easier.
For example, Google offers Gemma 4, an open model specifically optimized to run on everyday devices such as phones, tablets, and laptops.
Is Gemma 4 going to outperform the biggest frontier models on complicated problems?
No.
But if I’m working with information I absolutely do not want sent to somebody else’s server, I’ll happily sacrifice intelligence for privacy.
For extremely sensitive legal documents, medical information, financial records, trade secrets, or private company information, that’s definitely worth thinking about.
Venice AI Image Generation Review
Venice has come a long way with AI images.
Here are a few examples:



You can now access a ridiculous number of image models from one interface, including some of the biggest names available.
But there’s an important catch here, too.
The best image models aren’t necessarily included as unlimited generations with your Venice Pro subscription.
Many premium image models consume credits that you have to buy separately, just like the text models.
This is one of those details that’s easy to miss when you first sign up, so I’m mentioning it now before you enthusiastically subscribe and discover your shiny new AI toy has microtransactions.
Venice Pro does include image generation and gives you monthly credits for premium features. But if you plan on heavily using premium image, video, music, API, or frontier AI models, you may burn through those credits and need to spend a lot of additional money.
That doesn’t necessarily make Venice a bad image platform. It isn’t.
It means you need to understand what the $18 per month subscription actually includes.
Venice AI Voice Mode Is Pretty Good, But the Time Limit Is Very Low
Venice also finally has a much more realistic Voice Mode.
It’s considerably better than the generic robotic voice functionality Venice had when I originally reviewed the platform.
Unfortunately, Venice gives Pro subscribers just one hour of Voice Mode usage per 30 days.
ChatGPT Plus currently gives users substantially more Voice usage on a rolling 24-hour basis, depending on which Voice model you select.
That comparison is brutal.
And ChatGPT’s latest Voice experience sounds very human while also integrating things like memory and web search.
So yes, Venice Voice Mode has improved a lot.
Just don’t get too attached to it.
It’s on the clock, and your one hour per month is quickly ticking away.
Can Venice AI Be Trusted?

This is where you get the inside information.
Pay attention to every word you’re about to read.
It’s the type of insight that you won’t find anywhere else on the internet.
Venice doesn’t want you to know this.
I was an affiliate for Venice for almost two years. Not just any affiliate. I was their top affiliate and brand ambassador.
I made more Venice content than anyone else, and it wasn’t even close.
Over the past year, between the Run The Prompts YouTube channel and this website, that number was well over 120,000 views.
Over 120,000 views in one year, all by one person (me), and all of it was organic.
It takes a lot of time, knowledge, experience, and energy to be able to accomplish this.
It’s not easy.
I had a documented agreement in place to keep working with Venice through February of 2027, at least.
Then, in May of 2026, with zero notice, Venice’s new Marketing leadership team decided to immediately shut down their entire affiliate program, including their affiliate relationship with Run The Prompts.
It gets much worse.
They tried to convince me that they needed to obtain my proprietary business data to potentially keep the affiliate relationship going through February 2027. I believe they had no right to do this.
When they got me on a Zoom call to discuss the situation, they were highly disrespectful, unprofessional, dismissive, threatened me to not CC specific employees on email chains, made an outrageous false claim about me, and treated me like an adversary instead of the partner who had been driving more traffic to and awareness of their brand than anyone else on the internet.
To me, it seemed crystal clear that the only thing they wanted was my proprietary data and then to throw me away like a piece of trash. Needless to say, I did not provide them with my data and never will. You know, it’s funny, too. For a company who claims to care so little about tracking user data, they certainly seemed to have a fetish for obtaining mine.
Here is what you need to understand from reading this.
Is Venice AI legit? Yes, Venice is a real company with a real AI platform.
Is Venice AI trustworthy? That is a completely different question.
I don’t think Venice is a company you can trust.
I am telling you this from direct personal experience with their leadership team.
They claim to be private. That’s how they market themselves everywhere. I cannot prove whether they actually are or are not private. Maybe they are.
But ask yourself this: Would you want to trust a company that treats their number one brand ambassador this way?
If this is how they operate with their top affiliate and brand ambassador, by a wide margin, the person bringing them the most revenue and exposure, do you really believe they are going to protect your best interests?
Personally, I do not.
And after what they pulled with me, I would not blame you for coming to the same conclusion.
The Hard Line: What “Unfiltered” and “No Filters” Really Mean
Let’s get this straight. When we talk about an “unfiltered” AI with “no filters,” we’re talking about freedom from the corporate-approved, woke, overly sensitive censorship that blocks everything from a swear word to a politically incorrect joke to legal sexual content. It’s an AI that treats you like an adult.
This absolutely does not mean it’s a free-for-all to break the law.
Venice’s terms, like any legitimate platform’s, strictly forbid creating illegal content. This includes, but is not limited to, any content involving minors, non-consensual acts, or anything that violates privacy or defamation laws. An “unfiltered” experience is for creative freedom within the bounds of the law, not for committing crimes.
Rather watch a video? Tune into our Venice AI review video here. Just keep in mind that this video was created prior to the dramatic end between Run The Prompts and Venice due to Venice’s greed and shady behavior. And be sure to subscribe to us on YouTube.
Venice AI Review Verdict: Is Venice Worth It in 2026?
To summarize this Venice AI review in one sentence: I no longer recommend Venice, and I no longer think it’s worth it.
Venice isn’t useless, and it’s still a decent product, but let’s just say…the times they have ‘a changed.
The old Venice is no more.
And it may never be coming back ever again.
Have you used Venice recently? Let me know what your experience has been in the comment section below.
Until next time, remember to run the prompts and prompt the planet.
Disclaimer & Boundaries: This Venice review is for educational and entertainment purposes, exploring what’s possible with AI tools. You are 100% responsible for your actions and must obey all laws—especially those concerning age, consent, and likeness. Creating illegal content is strictly forbidden. We do not condone it, and we are not liable for the consequences if you choose to break the rules. Use these tools responsibly.

29 comments
Do you have an updated review of Venice AI? I don’t think the claim of ‘unfiltered’ is true any longer.
It’s definitely still unfiltered. Is there any reason why you think it’s not?
I’m playing with the images a lot and they are definitely not “anything goes”. Underaged sexual connotations are not allowed and a big warning “breach of terms of service” is displayed. I have even had the word ‘lad’ trigger this.
Hi Tozzer, if you’re trying to generate underage sexual images, then I don’t know what to tell you other than get off this site and don’t come back. Even uncensored tools need to shield themselves from that type of content. That’s just common sense. Venice does not allow for the creation of illegal content.
Well, your opinion of that other person aside, he does have a point. They shouldn’t claim to be uncensored/unfiltered if they are not. Right? And that is not the limit…
I just made a test: You can create an image of two men beating up eachother – but not beating a woman.
I do not condone this at all, but it does show censorship. I am sure more tests will result in even more cases on censorship.
So, Venice might be less censored than eg. ChatGPT, but not at all uncensored. You and I might think that about the kind of things they censor what we want, and so, too, about people seeking it, but we have to be fair to the fact, that Venice.ai is censored.
Claiming otherwise (as they do) as a sales argument is wrong. They could say “way less censored than CHatGPT and others”, but not uncensored.
If you’re looking for a tool that generates heinous or illegal content, then find another tool. That’s not what Venice is for.
Tell me about the unedited explicit version of babe pig in the city according to the information from adult websites
What?
Damn. Now I’m embarrassed. I am NOT trying to do anything inappropriate. I was trying to generate some pictures of public places and spaces avoiding real people to illustrate concepts of good urban design. Things like the challenges a parent with a pram faces with steps. I just found it interesting how hyper-sensitive Venice could be. As you said, it’s probably for the best.
No problem, I believe you. Thanks
Pretty cool looking. I mess around with a basic ChatGPT subscription, but I might give Venice a try! Thanks for the info!
No problem, glad to help!
It can’t do images very well, it does nsfw roleplay fine even with very freaky stuff, but ask it to make a image of a furry character like what you may find on e621 and it creates a legit dog/wolf no humanoid not animal human with animal features… Creates a dog with a human face… No! Draw a human body with animal ears, creates legit dog again like it has just two modes animal or people but can’t combine them, doesn’t know what furry is thinks it means dog or cat. I gave up
Paid for pro tho for nsfw roleplay, very nice. Sometimes I could get grok to do that but if it crosses a line into force or blackmail it would sorry can’t continue, chatgpt wouldn’t even get that far, this hasn’t had any censorship yet. It seems to assume a lot too nice, like In a roleplay I won’t have even got to a kinky part yet and it will hint at where it thinks I’m going and it’s right lol
Interesting. I’ve never tried creating the types of images your describing. Thanks for running the prompts with us!
Looks awesome
I see a lot of posts of people trying to do Kiddie p**n or furry p**n and we talk about how Venice is censoring it, I don’t think it’s such a thing as Venice is censoring it, it’s doing it for humanity purposes it’s just something as a society that we shouldn’t promote discuss or think it’s an OK thing. if you wanna play around with it sure but i would’nt be asking AI models to not have any type of morals or some sort of human decency because eventually you could just psychologically get out of hand. So if there is some censorship I’m sure it’s understandable why it’s doing it.
Exactly.
Fraud based AI
Venice AI “uncensored” is similar to redquill AI in terms of creating story within their “limitations”, although pushed to limits, Venice AI has higher ceiling than redquill. I won’t discuss it here bcs ppl already had it discussed, since Venice AI has the same ‘western’ backbone/morality, esp. the US and Europe. Other than that, it is not uncensored, but it is unfiltered, but still censored in some things.
You are correct. It is censored in some things. Like illegal activity.
Kind of a rhetorical question that doesn’t really change the big picture: Were you able to claim that Venice is a company we “should” trust before you fell out with them?
How does your personal perception of them, backed by anecdotal experience, change the validity or legitimacy of your opinion about it?
I agree with all your points that have nothing to do with your personal experiences. They’re just logically sound. And you cover your butt by pointing out that this is just your personal experiences and you’re not substantiating any real claims, but you’re still saying it.
“Would you trust someone who treats me this way?”
Would I trust them if they treated you well? No.
I am not totally understanding your question or questions here. What are you asking me?
is there an alternative to Venice you recommend?
For private chats, I’d recommend Siri AI (yes, I’m serious – it uses Apple Private Compute).
For uncensored image and video creation, I’d recommend Dzine: https://www.dzine.ai/?via=rtp
Don’t use Venice.
What about for story writing? Nothing too crazy, just erotica that Gemini, Claude, and ChatGPT can’t do. Grok can, but it’s a pretty bad writer.
Hmm, I have no experience with that. Writing has historically been best with Claude, but of course, Claude is not censored. I wish I could help, but I don’t know. I’d suggest experimenting with as many uncensored models as possible to find the best.
Thanks for your input. Claude won’t shy away from sexy, but it will from actual sex scenes. Fade to black, not really different from the others. Of the big platforms, only Grok will write the actual smut but sucks at prose as I said. It will also be very one track mind and repeat details over and over. For anyone else interested reading this, I’m trying Sudowrite and Venice as a free user, and so far, am pleased with the results.
Hello, thank you for the read, it was very interesting one considering I first heard of Venice.ai from you, and I would like to share some of my few thoughts about this.
About the update frequency, the Venice developers back then may have used simple development tools, where the backend JavaScript application would automatically prompt you to refresh the page if the developers changed any code related to the chat page. However, maybe they began adopting proper version control and push changes only after internal testing, so the “refresh” prompt appeared less often.
What did change was how frequent they published the list of changes. Early 2025 they still updated very frequently, but by around April 2025 they seemed to slow down, and from Sept 15, they did not publish any changelog until Oct 20, which is 5 weeks, when previously they published the changelog every one week. All for a “Venice V2” no one really knows who asked for, and now changelogs only contain new models and changes are mostly directed at API, which is for power users and enterprise users mostly, nor the general one.
About model availability, many good models are now pay per use. DeepSeek V4 Flash, a good one, used to be free for subscribing users, but it is now credit-based too, and you cannot use pay-per-use text models if you have below 100 credits (image and video models still work if enough credits). Image models are also terrible. Apart from the free upscaling model for subscribers, their image models perform especially poorly on anatomy details and complex symmetric objects such as chains and glasses and perform poorly on art (including nonsexuak ones).
Recently they made the “Minds” feature, which is just Characters, but uses an “Agentic” model and currently it is impossible to view the system prompt used for any Minds. By contrast Characters feature only prevents you from seeing uploaded context PDF and text files. You also cannot change the model, manage Memory and Insights within a Mind as easy as Characters.
At this point, using OpenRouter (pay before use) is the more sensible choice, considering Venice.AI as an endpoint also appears on OpenRouter, but the platform offers many other models from other providers that Venice.AI simply doesn’t have. Furthermore, API money inside OpenRouter stays yours until you use it, unlike Venice.AI even on higher tiers where credits roll over for only a few months for $68/mo and the $200/mo plans and not for $18/mo thing.
You are correct on most of your points here. Thank you for the feedback and for running the prompts with us.